As a little premise, I quit to update my Adobe programs, years ago, after CS6 because I do not like the subscription method and I never used Lightroom since I prefer CaptureOne or Irident. For editing, designing and books’ layout I still use the CS6 and I’m moving toward Affinity.
There are many reasons why I want to own and not to rent my software and I will not list the reasons here. Here I want to talk simply about privacy.

Reading about the rental options for Lightroom I was impressed by the offer of GigaBytes of cloud storage. All of the Adobe programs seem to be concentrated on the multi platform trend, so you can use them from your computer, tablet or phone. Reading comments to various posts I see the cloud storage is considered essential and a great value by many photographers.

I see people complaining for the rental costs, others happy but nobody worrying about the cloud and the privacy of our clients.

To understand why I worry you need to know my photographic background. In my professional life I was concentrated on commercial and industrial photography, this means I had to photograph a lot of products that were still not on the market,  industrial procedures waiting for a patent, prototypes and a lot of other things that could had a huge value for my clients’ competitor if known before the public presentation.

As personal projects I like also to do nudes, I find that a great way to distract myself from the commercial habits.

With some of the commercial clients I had to sign a non disclosure contract to assure them the images could not arrive at the competitors before they decided, with some clients in the prototype industry I was even prohibited to tell I was working for them, as an extra safety measure.
With nudes I think I do not have to explain why the privacy of the client is important and why I do everything I could to protect the images in case the clients do not want them published.

To manage all this problems I always had a computer non connected online. Call me paranoid but in my youth I had a lot of fun with Linux and programming so I know how easy can be to access a normal computer.
Some of my clients files were opened, elaborated, burn encrypted on a dvd, deleted from the hard disk (actually a low level format to eliminate the option of a recovery) and put in a safe box at the bank. I did the same for some industrial clients or for some nudes when the client asked for privacy. The files were never on a connected computer.

When Adobe started with the mandatory subscription system for me was impossible to adapt, I needed computers able to be offline all their life without having to deal with complicate procedures to activate them once a month.

Now I read a lot of people use the cloud to store the files and work on multiple devices.

So, a lot of photographers have the pictures of their clients stored in a server where other people can have access, for maintenance for example, and where a good hacker can probably enter.
Do the photographers ask for permission to the clients to store the images in a cloud server? When the photographer sign the contract with the cloud provider is he aware that he is signing for his personal images but not for a client image?

We continue to hear about hackers entering big corporations servers as Yahoo and steal users data, do photographers really believe the cloud is safe? Most of all, did they read the contract and the fine prints? Do they agree with it?

Most of the cloud servers must provide access to law enforcement, this can be positive on one side, but if they have a client that committed a felony and they stored the images on the cloud, do they automatically grant access to the images of all the clients stored in their slice of cloud?

Portraits, weddings, boudoir photography are all private moments. The client can be glad to share them or not. Someone having a boudoir session and after some years running for a public office can  be quite worried about the privacy, also if there is nothing wrong in taking a boudoir session. How can photographers guarantee they will do all is possible to protect the client’s privacy when they let the images go out of their hands?

We can be happy with governments (not specified… do you know where your cloud server is located?) going thru our personal data, but did we ask to our clients if they are also happy with that? Do photographers’ clients want their images processed with a program with facial recognition capabilities and always connected?

I really see a huge privacy problem with the images on the cloud because photographers are not telling the clients about it. An industry can loose millions of investments if the images of a prototype are stolen, a person can loose an electoral campaign if some private images are shared… or simply a person can just be private also if there is nothing at risk.

Most photographers seem to be not concerned with the cloud, very few are, I am for sure. I can be called paranoid but as they say: better safe than sorry.

I’m sure in the future there will be someone suing a photographer for a picture that became public and we will finally read the contracts of the cloud providers. For someone will be too late and most of all the damage will  be done to all the category, included the few photographers really worrying about the privacy of the cloud.

My first impact was to not consider the performance as something positive, but then I started to read the comments, all similar, just to quote some of them

“What happened to this world? Seriously.”
“What? She needs psychological help”
“A singularly perverted narcissist and exhibitionist. Gets her thrills this way. Proves no point!”
“She likes it?”
“A true media whore. People are morons…those people touching her are pigs.”
“Mediawhore”

and so on… you can imagine how it went on.

So I used Google to fine Milo Moire` page and read the explication of her performances and watched the others.

After the comments and after seeing the other performances I have to say I really like her and she made a perfect point. Particularly I liked the Protest over the Cologne attack. In a culture where the answer of Cologne Mayor was to suggest the women to cover themselves I though that this performance was perfect.

I’m a photographer, mostly a commercial photographer, but in the last years I started to take picture of nudes. It was my way to clear my mind from the clients needs and from my usual subjects. I liked it.

I had some nudes on the walls in my studio, most of them with just part of the female bodies without the face, like you see it here. Most of the models were non professional and did it to have a memory of their beauty for the future.

At least half of the males entering my studio started to ask information about the model, who was, how to contact her, presuming that if she posed naked she was a whore. That was absolutely disturbing for me.

We are in a society where the average age to loose the virginity is 13 years, sex is promoted everywhere in its most distorted and fetish ways, we have discussions about gender identity in the elementary schools, gay prides in every city and so on but a simple clean beautiful nude is not accepted. A nude woman is a whore for many man.

We arrived at absurdities like accusing raped women to have provoked the muslims in Cologne because they were not covered as they were wearing a burqa!
Milo Moire` is not only making a great point but she is making it for all us photographer that shoot nudes and respect the models, respect their boundaries and respect the fact that they can be naked females and still be women, clean, have a strong moral sense and not be merely whores.

The moralism is the recent years is become crazy, let me give you an example.

We all know the famous photograph of a naked little girl escaping from napalm in Vietnam by Kim Phuc. This image was banned form Facebook because it portrayed a naked girl. In the meantime it’s full of girls promoting erotic shows in provocative positions but not banned because they have a cross tape on the nipples.

Watching movies we usually see some sex scenes where we can see or imagine every kind of sexual act but in the morning the girl wake up, take the sheets to cover her to walk to the bathroom. How absurd is that? No one has problem to explain to a kid why a person was naked going to take a shower, but try to explain why the actors had their heads between each other legs! And imagine the other person remained in bed naked without the sheets! It can be a real cause for divorce!!!

I usually watch movies on the Swiss television, Switzerland is an open minded country, with a strong moral but without moralism. Most of the movies are transmitted complete without censorship and, surprise, people is nude in the shower! A simple documentary about breast cancer prevention shows a breast, we are now used to crazy nipple censorship or flower vases in absurd locations just to cover. Did you really ever seen a flower vase in a breast screening medical room?

This is another great video that makes fun of the nipple pixelation syndrome

I look at the american trend of boudoir photography and sometime I laugh, the main goal of boudoir is to portray the subject in an erotic way, but if a nipple sleeps out people screams scared. There are some photographers that put the models in positions and with an illuminations and lingerie that seems perfect for a third class porn movie, but never a nipple out, or the world will collapse!

All this come from the idea that a naked body “provoke” and provocation justify a non civil action, even a rape! This is crazy, it is wrong and is damaging photographers all around the world and most of all the safety of women, as we have seen in Cologne.

Last year on youtube appeared a video called “The photographer”, about a photographer harassing a model. I found this so offensive for photographers and so wrong. What is the most wrong part in this? The model never said a simple “no” to any request!

Also, to imply that photographers and the studio environment are like that is exactly as to imply that models are whores. It is wrong on all levels and absolutely offensive!

The mirror performance by Milo Moire` is exactly the idea to put a limit. In her performance all is brought to an excess but also on the daily life of a person limits are essential, must be openly declared and most of all must be respected. And must be used and promoted as a moral code of conduct.
Milo’s performance is exactly the idea of a limit, to put boundaries even in an excessive situation where she asks strangers to touch her genital, but inside her rules.
A model that never says “no” to requests she does not like is guilty exactly as the horny photographer. A simple “no” was the solution for the situation portrayed in the video.

But we are so deep immersed in the idea that nude is provoking and provocation equals guilt that many people do not even understand the message of Milo Moire`, they refuse to accept it and the funniest thing is that mostly women do not accept the message.

To get back to photography one of my usual example is Jock Sturges, you can see some his images here. Sturges was accused by many people, some considered it pornography, other even asked to destroy his work.
I look at his pictures and I really thinks the the people with great sexual problems are the people seeing something pornographic or erotic in pictures that have nothing to do with sexuality and are just beautiful portraits with nudist people of all ages without an erotic side.
What really impresses me is that the photographer, or the subjects are condemned and labeled by the society and nobody is spending time to say that the immoral attitude is to perceive the pictures as arousing. We need to morally destroy the idea of perversions like pedophily and morally destroy the perverts, not censorship the nudity and become paranoid. I have the pictures of my father, born in 1926 and was the norm to have pictures naked of the kids, nobody ever seen in that something in any way connected with sexuality. Now is no more, and we condemn the pictures instead of condemning the perverts.

In the same way we ask to women in Europe to cover to not be raped instead to openly and with strong verbal violence condemn and accuse the rapists!

To conclude I like Milo Moire` because I read the comments of people accusing her to be a whore for her performances, I like her because is one of the few voices evidencing the absurdity to accuse the “provokers” instead of the rapists and most of all, I like her because she is fighting for all the people and photographer, like me that see nothing immoral or wrong about nudity in itself.

I add that when I was young I learned a great lesson by a photographer working for magazines as Penthouse. I met him during a viewcamera workshop in Shaffausen at Sinar, as a young photographer I asked him how he managed the arousement having to deal with all the sexy models photographing them in poses meant to arouse the readers. I was supposing he was telling me that you get kind of insensible to the subject, but he actually told me something more important that I used in all my life: “Contrary to what women jokes about, if the blood goes in your penis does not means it goes out of your brain, you can still think and be a gentleman, we are not animals, we have a brain and there resides the power, not between your legs!”

So, we are not animals…

Let’s now have fun and see the comments destroying me for this article